Alright, so vigilantism is a bit lot of a rather...controversial topic. Which is why instead of breaking it down bit by bit and really trying to argue with people and make sure that you're right and the other person is wrong. When it really comes down to it, there is no just black and white in this topic, instead there are varying shades of gray, something everyone has thought about and wondered about even if briefly for the smallest thing, something they wouldn't even consider it to make them a vigilante, but it does.
Moving quickly to the point is easy enough, vigilantism in the movies. Now there are more movies than I can name that employ some sort of vigilante as the main character(s), The Boondock Saints, Four Brothers, Law Abiding Citizen, and Spiderman are just a few in recent memory to name. And each is employed for different reasons in the movies, varying up the types of ways people could seek justice, or just revenge.
How often do revenge and vigilantism cross paths? Too often, in the movies people are almost always forced into taking the law into their own hands because of something that happened to them. These can be good people, or people who just were shady to begin with. Law Abiding Citizen and Four Brothers are perfect examples of two opposites. In the first, a good citizen has his family taken from him and the justice system fails to do anything, so he decides to do it himself. In Four Brother, four adopted brothers who are definitely on the wrong side of the law go seeking out the reason and the people who were responsible for the murder of their mother.
There can be problems with being a vigilante though, like in Spiderman, magazines and newspapers are able to turn people against him and make him out to be some sort of menace rather than actually trying to help people. When one person takes the responsibilities of an entire city if not more into his or her hands, they can be crushed under the weight or even turn to the dark side where they start abusing the power that they have taken on.
Contest or no contest, when it comes down to it, I believe strongly that vigilantism is absolutely necessary. Granted it can cause quite a few bad things, people thinking that how things happen in movies happen exactly like that, people who take it too far, and people who believe different things are wrong or right. While nearly all of us have the same moral standards and guidelines, some people have codes that are a LOT more stringent and they are much less forgiving. Anyway, it's needed. Too often the justice system that was set up to protect and help people just all out fails. There are people out there that have lost children, parents, siblings to some violent crime and have to deal with the fact that the perpetrator will be walking the streets in 5-10 years. Right, that fixes the problem.
Now I may be thinking of the most extreme form of vigilantism, an eye for an eye, but maybe that's what is necessary, you take someone's life and then yours gets taken from you. Obviously if you killed someone, you didn't give them the chance to live, and you played God,why in the hell can't someone else play God with your life? It is all a moral code, and either you have morals or you don't, those who don't tend to be the ones that are on the other side of the smoking barrel pointed at the back of their skull courtesy of Connor and Murphy McManus, if only we were that lucky.
It's hard to write my thoughts on vigilantism without using The Boondock Saints as an example, they are just prime and perfect. Two men, nothing really special about them, not wealthy by any means like Batman, no sort of super power to speak of like Spiderman or Superman, but they are still heroes. Well, heroes to the 99.8% of the population that Troy Duffy was speaking to with his powerful movies. When it comes down to it, those boys were really nothing special or out of the ordinary, just normal men that were no longer pleased with sitting back and watching things happen around them, instead they took it into their own hands, by the word of God and decided to do it, decided to stand for something and I think that is the most important.
My own mother is a fan of the BDS movies, and she said something that I just laughed off at first, keep in mind, these aren't her exact words but they are close. She told me the reason the movie was so popular and had such an underground following was because, "Every guy would love to do shit like that and handle it themselves and every girl would love to have that guy that was willing to do that." Now she isn't sexist and doesn't believe that women can't go out for a little justice every now and then, I know that's not true.
If you want to make it make sense, think about it. If you're a parent, what if someone kidnapped, raped and murdered your -child-, are you REALLY going to be content with sitting back and letting the courts handle everything and be prepared to let the person just walk free after they have served an 'appropriately assigned' time which ends up being five years, THREE after good behavior and parole? Is this an ACCEPTABLE substitute for the suffering your child endured and then end of his or her life?! You think if someone killed that man the next day, you'd feel guilty or upset over the loss of the waste of life? I don't know, maybe I'm too cynical and don't give enough credit to the forgive but not forget theory, I can only really comment on myself, and if someone ever took my sisters, mother or child from me...I would much rather that person was taken care of, permanently. Then not only could that person NEVER do that again, but it would be space for one more person on this planet that deserved it.
You know, it's a little known fact, but it is a fact. Do people really know what happens to the child abusers/murderers/rapists in prison? The prisoners hand out their own punishments to those people, typically they have to be segregated from the rest of the population for their protection. FOR THEIR PROTECTION. WHY is it that people like THAT deserve to be PROTECTED by the JUSTICE system that is supposed to be working AGAINST the guilty and FOR the victim?! How does this make sense? It doesn't, at all. Exactly WHY these movies stir so many feelings in people, because they know it's right, they know what's happening isn't enough and they know it should BE more like those movies. I guess, to me, it's not a question of whether or not the movies are good or bad, because it goes both ways. The only real question to me is what are people waiting for? Harsh and drastic, maybe, but this world needs a bit more right, a bit more just, and if that's one of the ways to dole it out, and the movies inspire so be it, but movies can only inspire, they can't force a person to do anything, so blaming ANYTHING on a movie, is pretty much ludicrous. Chill out, people, you can't blame the movies for everything.
And this definitely turned more into a rant than an actual debatable...professional little essay, but I don't really care, it's my mess of thoughts and that's pretty much good enough for me.
artistic
discontent
cynical